If nothing else, that book shows how comedy endures all attempts to stifle it, especially if it is good.Most people think of Siberia as one of the coldest, most inhospitable places on earth.Earlier this year, Kiku Sharda, another Indian comedian, was jailed for two weeks after he appeared to mimic Baba Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh Ji Insan, the motorcycle-riding flamboyant religious guru who leads the Dera Sacha Sauda sect." Tendulkar comes in for some corrosive ribbing about whether Virat Kohli is better than the Master Blaster."That, actually, is the point. And Vladimir Putin’s Russia has a lot to do with it.It does not come as a surprise to know that authoritarian regimes all over the world are wary of comedy, especially of its subversive power. And in recent days, numerous stand-up comedians have been holding forth on television.That was before last week’s knockout blow by l’affaire Tanmay Bhat. Bhat is being roasted but he has also become a household word, as has Snapchat.These laughtivists were not born so; China ALUMINIUM/STEEL SEALED TYPE BLIND RIVETS Suppliers they were made. The expletive-laced video, called "Sachin vs Lata Civil War" seeks to enact an imaginary conversation between Tendulkar and Mangeshkar using the face-swap feature, resulting in the two Indian icons vigorously jousting with each other. In the video, the face-swapped Mangeshkar is at the receiving end of lines like "Have you seen your face It looks like someone has kept you in water for, like, eight days. Fortunately the Bombay high court offered relief subsequently by noting that Trivedi’s cartoons did not incite violence and that they only expressed anger with the state machinery. Comedy, especially of the parody and satire kinds, provide an unforgiving mirror to society. Bhat has ensured that. Local authorities had said "no" to rallies. How tolerant should we be Can comedy be ever deemed a crime What if it is truly low-grade and tasteless You would not think such questions would dominate the national discourse in India at a time when huge swathes of the country are ravaged by drought, when a jobs drought threatens to knock the shine out of the "fastest growing economy" tag. So are many who profess their secularism.The jury is out on whether this is Indian stand-up comedy’s darkest hour or its most glorious moment. That depends on how you look at it. Bhat is a member of the comedians’ group All India Bakchod (AIB).And we find ourselves in this strange situation where a Snapchat video created at 3 am by a bored Bhat is national news. Can a FIR be filed against comedian Bhat Legal opinion is being sought. Most people think of Siberia as one of the coldest, most inhospitable places on earth. As a result, they are potent political weapons, used for centuries, though many anglophiles like to trace the origin to 1726, when Jonathan Swift wrote Gulliver’s Travels. The MNS is not the only party who is breathing fire and brimstone.Today, there is no getting away from Faceswap or Snapchat.
The Mumbai police has asked Facebook and YouTube to remove the video. Much of the humour in the video is crude and tasteless. The Nationalist Congress Party of Sharad Pawar is equally upset. In 2012, ahead of the presidential election in Russia, the Siberian city of Barnaul was suddenly in the news. It would not be incorrect to say that AIB is laughing its way to victory.Last year, a group of Muslim youths vandalised the office of a leading Marathi daily because they were angry about a "derogatory" cartoon and an article.com How does the system which is so slow to respond on so many vital issues act so quickly in the case of a spoof Bhat later said he was just fooling around and that he obviously loved Mangeshkar and Tendulkar but there is no let-up by the angry brigade. Kanpur-based cartoonist Aseem Trivedi shot into fame after he was charged with sedition.chatterjee@gmail. Sanjay Raut of the Shiv Sena has said people like Mr Bhat "should be whipped in public". And do not single out the saffron groups. It has put up another spoof, "Unoffended", which claims to be a special news report on a horrifying terror group with the motto of never taking undue offense to things. Attacks on the comedian have only given it a longer than natural lease of life.The writer focuses on development issues in India and emerging economies. In that case, it will die a natural death.The toy protest was eventually also banned but not before most of Russia and the rest of the world had learnt about it, and laughed heartily. No longer.There was a time when one could get away by staring blankly if one was asked "How do you do Face Swap on Snapchat Only millenials were supposed to know such stuff. And suchlike. Not many people think Tanmay Bhat’s piece was any good. But what about free societies Comedy thrives on breaking taboos. It also has accomplished groups of "laughtivists", activists whose trademark is hilarity, famous political activist Srdja Popovic tells us in his seriously funny book Blueprint for Revolution. But they had not counted on people gathering in the centre of town with their children’s toys — plastic elephants, toy tigers and Lego men carrying banners against Mr Putin’s 12-year rule. Sharda was taken into custody for offending the "sentiments" of the Baba. Hyderabad-based Shashank tweeted: "It is simple — you don’t like a joke, turn a blind eye to it." And "Jon Snow (Game of Thrones) also died, so you should also die. The real comedy, however, is the disproportionate reaction to the video with Mumbai cops seeking legal opinion on how to crack down on comedian Bhat. The over-the-top reactions of some of his critics who want to hang him, whip him, jail him and probably toss him to the lions have kept the story alive.This is clearly about hitting at holy cows. Mumbai’s political analysts darkly hint at the shadow of next year’s municipal elections in the city. The cops vs comedian story popped up in the wake of a complaint from the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS).India has a rich heritage of humour but are holy cows still too holy to be hit Twitter, that repository of contemporary wit and wisdom, put it crisply. She can be reached at patralekha. Comedian Bhat’s Snapchat video mocking two of India’s greatest icons, Lata Mangeshkar and Sachin Tendulkar, is now a big story in the traditional and social media. Snapshots were taken of the "nanoprotests" to highlight the restrictions faced by many groups.This is not, of course, the first time that comedy is being bracketed with crime in this country. Like you do to poverty, patriarchy, child labour, racism and sexism
. This is what he had to say: "Not ashamed, neither shamed. He had even joined a gym in London and hired a celebrity trainer to shed some extra pounds.Actor Fardeen Khan, who has been away from the limelight for a few years now, recently stepped out into public view sporting a rather bulky look. Am I happy Emphatically!!! Infact, living the happiest chapter thus far with lbs to show for it." (Sic)The actor, after thanking Adnan for his support, lashed out at trollers and posted a long note on his social media handle. However, singer Adnan Sami tweeted in support of the actor saying, "Pls stop judging ppl by their CONCEALED HEAD STUDS Suppliersphysiques. Fardeen’s weight-gain came as a shock to many of his fans, who had last seen the actor with a chiselled physique wooing ladies on the screen. He did managed to shed 12 kilos back in 2014.." (Sic) To make matters worse for Fardeen, the social media went into a frenzy and soon, memes on the actor’s weight gain started doing the rounds. It’s akin 2 #racism! A person is gud or bad thru d soul & not by d weighing scales! #FardeenKhan. Fardeen Khan’s # current look (left) and how he looked earlier (right) Actor Fardeen Khan, who has been away from the limelight for a few years now, recently stepped out into public view sporting a rather bulky look. But it looks like the actor’s now back to square one.Happy to have been weekend’s entertainment for you trollers My best wishes. The actor, who now looks almost unrecognisable with a double-chin, has been struggling with weight issues for the past few years. Not depressed. Not blind either. Not offended
The PPP leader vowed to stand by the "oppressed" in Kashmir.The PPP chief said Prime Minister Sharif’s government will not be able to complete its constitutional term as the days of the government have been numbered after the onset of the Panama leaks. He added that the global community had turned a blind eye towards the Kashmir dispute and stated that unarmed Kashmiris and Palestinians were being subjected to atrocities.Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) chief Bilawal Bhutto has called Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif a “personal friend” of his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi, willing to sacrifice national interests for frien Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) chief Bilawal Bhutto has called Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif a "personal friend" of his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi, willing to sacrifice national interests for friendship. He criticised the United Nations for its inability to resolve the Kashmir issue, stating that the United Nations had passed resolutions regarding Kashmir, however, it failed to implement those resolutions.""Nawaz Sharif, you talk about human rights, but you never raise voice against human rights violations in Kashmir," he said."Nawaz Sharif is a personal friend of Narendra Modi.Addressing a public rally in Kotli district of Pakistan-Occupied Kashm-ir, he claimed that Mr Sharif never uttered even a single word against the "atrocities being committed by Indian troops in the Kashmir. Mr Bhutto said that peace in South Asia will also result in peace in the Middle East."Nawaz Sharif, you step down as Prime Minister till probe into Panama Papers and then you can reassume the office after the completion of the investigation (sic)," he said at China REDUCE HEAD KNURLED BODY BLIND RIVET NUTS the public rally organised in connection with the upcoming state polls. Pakistan’s foreign policy under Nawaz Sharif’s leadership also reflects his business interests," he said. Kashmir, he said, was a symbol of struggle in the entire world. But I would never stop supporting the oppressed class there," he added. "Whenever I talk about Kashmir, the Indian government and media severely criticise me
but you live, you love, you are so full of joy that there is no need for any language; your very presence becomes the argument for my existence.God became intrigued with the mystic and came to the Sufi and said, "I am immensely happy because that’s how I want people to be.A person who meditates sincerely generates tremendous energy within and around him. What is the condition "The Sufi said, "My condition is that I should not become aware of what is happening through me, by you."The Sufi said, "But I don’t need anything. The same could happen to a devotee whose prayers originate from his heart and is not a mechanical ritual taught by priests. I can give you powers to do miracles, and you can change the lives of all these people. That is why you have become the prayer.. Don’t ask for yourself, but you can ask for others, because there are millions of people who are miserable, sick and have never known anything for which they can be grateful.In one of his discourses on The Hidden Splendour, Osho makes this point with a Sufi story: One Sufi mystic was so full of love and joy — his life was filled with laughter, music and dancing. Existence blesses him with healing powers that are also felt by others. And this will be so: you will never know what things are happening around you. It should happen behind my back, it should happen through my shadow, not through me."God said, "With a condition You are UNTHREADED STUD Company really strange. I don’t want them to pray for an hour and do the opposite in the remaining 23 hours.jpg A person who meditates sincerely generates tremendous energy within and around him. Many go on an ego trip of changing the world as a missionary."The Sufi said, "If you are insisting, then with a condition I can accept your gift. So God became very interested in him because he never asked anything; he never prayed. The healing power with the meditator or the devotee is not something of his own, but a blessing from the divine or God’s grace. INTERNET_STOCK_SP. You can ask for anything. The blessed one cannot claim it as his own.""I have watched you and I have loved you.""If I know it — that I have done it, or even that God has chosen me as the instrument to do it — it is dangerous. I may be passing and my shadow may fall on a dead tree, and the tree may become alive again, but I should not know it, because I don’t want to fall back. So my condition is: a blind man may start seeing, but neither should he know that it is because of me, nor should I know that it is because of me. You are, right now, my only argument in the world that something more than man exists — although you have never argued, you have not even uttered my name. I want to give you a blessing. When the flower blooms, it has the fragrance that spreads around. And I will remember your condition.. I don’t want them to become pious once they enter the mosque, and when they go back, they leave their piousness in the mosque and are just their old selves: angry, jealous, full of anxiety and violence. You are generous, you are loving, you are compassionate, but I am so full, there is no space within me for anything else. He never went to the mosque, he never even uttered the name of God."God said, "I knew you would not ask for anything. Miracles will happen. My shadow behind my back will do all the miracles. Authenticity is needed in both the cases. Forgive me, I cannot ask because I really don’t need anything."Swami Chaitanya Keerti, editor of Osho World, is the author of Osho Fragrance end-of. You will have to forgive me, I cannot ask for anything. The flower does not go into an ego trip; ego is a great destroyer. Existence blesses him with healing powers that are also felt by others. If anybody asked him whether God exists or not, he simply laughed, but never answered."And it is said that God said to him, "You are not only strange, you are unique and rare. Those are superfluous things
:: بازدید از این مطلب : 118
|
امتیاز مطلب : 0
|
تعداد امتیازدهندگان : 0
|
مجموع امتیاز : 0
تاریخ انتشار : چهار شنبه 19 شهريور 1399 |
نظرات ()
The Queen’s spokespeople have challenged the Sun story, which was that at a gathering of some ministers of the Privy Council, traditionally advisers to the monarch, she expressed strong opinions in favour of Brexit.Neither Mr Clegg nor Mr Gove have categorically said that the Queen said no such thing. Mr Cameron wisely or unwisely allowed his ministers to dissent and the Tories are now at war with themselves. The Queen, and indeed the members of the Royal family, are permitted to pilot helicopters, join the armed forces, head up charities and international commissions to get rid of landmines, to ride in carriages and wave at the public, to throw garden parties for their subjects, speak on behalf of British business on forums abroad, launch ships, cut ribbons to open fetes and many other duties. On June 23, British voters will be summoned to a referendum which will determine the issue by a majority vote. Royalty are now figureheads and they are not so much "above" politics and policies, as forbidden to participate in them.According to this constitution, ever since Cromwell and his Republicans (not to be confused with Donald Trump’s lot) cut off Charles I’s head in the 17th century, the monarchs of England have haemorrhaged power. One or two Cabinet members, serving in Mr Cameron’s government are shamelessly positioning themselves to succeed him as Prime Minister. One of the Brexit advocates, Michael Gove, who is serving at present as justice minister is suspected of using what the unwritten British constitution considers a dirty tactic. In this case, it’s the argument of whether to stay in European Union or to leave it. The Sun now says it has very many more details which it hasn’t yet published and that it is ready to face an investigation into the scoop as it stands by the two impeccable sources who gave the paper the story.Of course, the opponents of Brexit, those who want Britain to remain in the EU, which includes British Prime Minister David Cameron, argue that the bombings prove that cooperation between European nations is the only guarantee of future security. The Queen can’t very well now say that the story is a lie and that she wholeheartedly supports being in the EU. Mr Clegg merely said he could recall nothing. An enquiry by the regulators of the British press has been initiated. They are not permitted to say what they think of cutting taxes or increasing them, of going to war in Iraq or for that matter to say whether they think Britain is better off outside the EU or inside it. As in the internecine wars of the Mughals, the ultimate prize is the top job. It will enquire into whether the Queen did breach the convention of strict political neutrality.“Twinkle twinkle little starWe by-and-large know what you areThough it may sound a little crassYou’re just a bunch of nucleating gasTwinkle twinkle little star "Twinkle twinkle little starWe by-and-large know what you areThough it may sound a little crassYou’re just a bunch of nucleating gasTwinkle twinkle little starA billion light years is much too far "From The Collected Works of L. The voters of England rule, okay The Queen and her household are expected to venture no political opinion and Elizabeth II is reputed to have staunchly avoided any interference in government or public policy. When the Privy Councillors met the Queen, Michael Gove was education minister and was present when the Sun says the Queen expressed such an opinion. Mr Gove is the justice minister in the present government and a very vociferous and influential voice on the Brexit ticket. The corollary: British voters should vote to leave. By Bachchoo)No sooner had news of the suicide bombings in Brussels hit the world than the vile opportunists of British politics began using the slaughter to further the ends of their political argument. Her job depends on remaining neutral, even though this job is defined by an unwritten constitution and relies on precedent, on tradition and to a certain degree on common sense. The Queen’s people, backed by one of the then ministers present, Nick Clegg of the Liberal Democratic Party who is now out of government and is strongly opposed to Brexit, said no such conversation took place. The editor of the Sun, Tony Gallagher, says he won’t disclose the identity of his highly reliable sources but will back up his paper’s scoop with more information.The Queen is now accused by the Sun newspaper of breaking the golden rule of silence and expressing an opinion on Brexit to politicians and ministers who were her guests at Windsor Palace. The Sun and its sources certainly calculate that the Queen’s opinion will influence a significant number of voters. Mr Gove told Mr Cameron, his boss and personal friend, who is on the opposite side, that it was not he who leaked the story to the Sun and Mr Cameron told the world that he believed his pal. When asked to confirm or deny the Sun’s story, he merely said, "have a nice day" or "how’s your uncle" or some such deeply meaningful denial to the reporters hounding him. Their antagonisms bear comparison to a Mughal war of succession in which sons will imprison fathers and blind or kill their brothers. The issue is the hottest potato in British politics today and promises to be so for at least the duration of this year and perhaps this Parliament, whose term expires in 2020. Mr Cameron and his finance minister George Osborne, who is also against leaving the EU, are in trouble. In all probability it will not force the Sun to reveal its sources because if the revelation does implicate Mr Gove, it will put him in a very awkward constitutional position as violating the privacy of the Privy Council and the Queen. Fell (Ed. The proponents of British exit from the EU ("Brexit"), even before the blood in the Brussels Metro was dry, issued scare-mongering statements China Aluminum/Steel CSK Head Blind Rivets Company claiming that the acts of terror which murdered 35 people and injured 150 was a direct consequence of membership of the European Union
That such an endorsement may eventually trigger a return to the dark past when democratic institutions and thought were bludgeoned into submission is a real worry for mainstream political parties. Yet, three months later, Mr Trump has expanded an Islamophobic campaign that buttresses insecurity among White Americans and plays on this group’s fear of the "other" who, in their imagination, is sounding the death knell for white supremacy. This underscores the inherent hypocrisy of democratic nations because they confront Islamophobists in their countries with regularity but display concern on Mr Modi’s prejudice-promoting politics only when Christians and their religious properties are targeted. Even earlier, mainstreaming of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and the Jana Sangh was a result of its partnership with other anti-Congress parties during the Emergency, when it became part of the Janata Party.In the aftermath of the events in Jawaharlal Nehru University, the ruling dispensation is forcing every person intervening in the debate to first prove his/her nationalistic commitment. Muslims, according to Mr Trump, are bad because they import terror while Indians are evil for stealing jobs. Last year, when India marked the 40th anniversary of the imposition of Emergency, L. In most countries, public support for this viewpoint, though significant, has not been overwhelming — one that could force a change in the dominant political discourse. Unlike in Europe or the US, this change has not been overnight; it has been accompanied by the Bharatiya Janata Party’s gradual progression to power.The writer is the author of Narendra Modi: The Man, the Times and Sikhs: The Untold Agony of 1984 The challenge to Mr Trump’s proposition that security challenges in Europe can be met only by racial and sectarian means suggests that the majority of people and political forces do not support his tactics and theories. Will someone be labelled anti-India for supporting Bangladesh in the T-20 finals Will I be anti-national by wishing that JNU should remain as it is India is beginning to resemble Hirak Rajya or the Kingdom of Diamonds, the imaginary kingdom of Satyajit Ray’s classic Hirak Rajar Deshe. Advani stunned the nation by stating that he did not rule out the possibility of a similar situation in future. At that time, Mr Trump securing a presidential nomination appeared as remote a possibility as any of them becoming the next Indian President. Questioning its steps or saying that the Indian armed forces do not have the best of human rights records is labelled a grossly anti-national act. Instead of official censorship, there is social restriction on what can be said. Emergency may not have been imposed by law but it is already in place by action. Governments and mainstream political parties have, by and large, reacted with dread to odd groups channelising this nascent support and converting it into a wider backing. Moral and political custodians of the day can then be reformed and a semblance of pluralism restored in our social discourse. Despite charges of Prime Minister Narendra Modi being complicit in anti-Muslim riots in Gujarat in 2002, which led to global condemnation and extreme steps like denying him a visa to the US and disapproval in the UK, after he became Prime Minister, several nations and their leaders, starting with the US, the UK, France and Germany among several others, fawned over him as the new hero from India who would not only transform bilateral partnerships with their country but also become a more potent global ally in the war against terror.25 billions people forces them to pay obeisance. They stand in line waiting for their turn to be hugged and get selfies taken because in their mind they are tabulating economic gains from treaties and agreements. No effort is made to rationally detail what being anti-India means.Over the past two and a half decades, India has witnessed a steady rise in support for majoritarianism and totalitarian definition of nationalism. Compared to the 1980s, the majority of Indians have an altered perspective now when talking on the minority question and the relationship of the majority community with the minorities. The rise of Islamic terror post-Cold War has witnessed resurgence of Right-wing politics in several parts of the Western world, including Europe. It is forgotten that anyone who questions accepted assumptions is neither rejecting the broad consensus nor committing a crime. After all, the West has always turned a blind eye to human rights violations in countries it has economic interests.In the past 22 months, India has taken a huge step back. Yet, his claim of representing 1.The American establishment is not exactly gung-ho at the prospect of Mr Trump becoming President and upsetting the status quo. The Indian Army is now viewed as an institution that can do no wrong. One can hope that a fantasy machine like the film’s Jantar Mantar miraculously appears. The attack on JNU and other temples of learning resembles the despot’s decision to shut schools because knowledge empowers people to protest. Forget dissent, one is not even allowed to question basic presumptions of the ruling government. Yet, we have a situation in India where the ruling party and government browbeat the entire populace into accepting a unitary view on every issue. In conversations with diplomatic representatives of several nations, it is evident that they consider Mr Modi little more than a showman. Not agreeing with the BJP discourse — no one should have a contrarian view on Afzal Guru or Yakub Memon’s execution — means that the person is anti-national. The rise of the BJP, it must be factored, was greatly assisted by other political parties which facilitated this by discreet electoral pacts and open coalitions since the 1980s.Three months ago, I jocularly argued in these columns (Our ‘liberal’ worries, December 18) that American presidential aspirant Donald Trump could be considered an avatar of fringe Hindutva politicians China FLAT HEAD SLOTTED BODY BLIND RIVET NUTS Company Three months ago, I jocularly argued in these columns (Our ‘liberal’ worries, December 18) that American presidential aspirant Donald Trump could be considered an avatar of fringe Hindutva politicians like Praveen Togadia, Sakshi Maharaj and Yogi Adityanath.K. Mr Trump attacks all immigrants; Muslims and Indians constitute a fair number of them. Questioning authority — political as well as intellectual — is the essence of democracy
In the three years I spent at St. From what my contemporaries tell me, their late-night sessions at the various dhabas and hostel rooms were equally enthralling — with the presence of women students adding to the attraction. Its admissions policy was structured to ensure that people with access to less privileged undergraduate education were accommodated. Whereas the Stephanians compensated this shortcoming with a vibrant culture of peer group support, it discriminated against those who needed constant encouragement and even some spoon-feeding.I am not in a position to accurately reflect the quality of social life in JNU. The political spectrum was wide but could have been wider. This was partly due to a sharp abhorrence of the senselessness of a preceding generation that had chosen to abandon their studies and go "underground" to join the Naxalite movement in some corner of Bihar. A consequence of this social levelling was that the student body had a far richer and varied social connect. Their traumatic experiences — usually marked by an overwhelming sense of futility — narrated to us by those who had returned to complete their education, proved a major deterrent. However, what was disconcerting was that it ended with a bout of voluble and excitable war of slogans between supporters and opponents of our present Prime Minister. Stephen’s College, situated at the other end of Delhi, JNU epitomised the exact opposite of our undergrad experience. Southern and western India was, by contrast, under-represented. That, after all, is the hallmark of student meetings. However, the overwhelming majority were from similar English-medium schools and, consequently, shared not only a common language but broadly similar social assumptions. The ridiculously cheap (often verging on near-zero cost) fees also made it possible for students with modest parental income to receive quality education. At Stephen’s the overwhelming majority shunned political activism. For a start, it was socially varied. But what seems apparent is the fact that blind hatred towards a regime, the growing obsolescence of a belief system and the rise of alternative challenges has propelled a move towards unacceptable extremism. Many of these Coffee House friendships have endured over the years.Contrary to a stereotypical view that some people have of me, I entertain a sneaking admiration of Jawaharlal Nehru University. Today, after Mr Modi’s victory in 2014, and the growing marginalisation of the Left, it is this sloganeering that has become the norm with absolutely absurd fringe groups using the campus as a safe house. However, there was one major difference. Thus, even the handful of us who were excited and inspired by Jayaprakash Narayan’s "total revolution" call, were not enthralled by the idea of abandoning studies for a year. In an article celebrating the JNU ambience, Professor Peter DeSouza — a truly wonderful individual whose political orientation is far removed from mine — has argued that in JNU "the liberal persuasion was not allowed the space it should have been given by the Stalinist Left. This, quite naturally, facilitated a better quality of education. I can recall the unending early-evening adda sessions at the University Coffee House that used to be located at the rear corner of the vice-chancellor’s office. Finally, the collegiate atmosphere of the two institutions was markedly different. Stephen’s, the high points of political excitement were a boisterous meeting of Tariq Ali (organised on a Sunday evening by Stephanians who were now in JNU) and convivial discussions with the likes of the amiable Piloo Mody of the Swatantra Party. Second, unlike Delhi University where the engagement between students and teachers was nominal at the post-graduate level, except at the Delhi School of Economics, JNU’s healthy student-teacher ration made it possible for teachers to engage more closely with their students. What has stunned me is not a possible police flat-footedness but the inability of the larger JNU community (and its fellow travellers) to acknowledge that even intellectual permissiveness has its limits. It was here that some of us got to be friends with the likes of Arun Jaitley, an ABVP activist and an office bearer China Aluminum/Stainless Steel Open Type Blind Rivets of the Delhi University Student’s Union. Stephanians were usually disdainful of activism. And that wider society also matters. All the 57 varieties of Marxist thought may have been rigorously dissected but it was all Left politics and more Left politics. The political fare offered at JNU was both more varied and limited. Analytical thinking was feeble and ideological camps gave protection to the less capable. The college "residence" (as the hostel was called) had a generous sprinkling of students from Patna, Hazaribagh, Jaipur, Calcutta, Lucknow and the north-eastern states. Yes, St. This is not to imply that they were apolitical. Stephen’s had a fairly representative student body in terms of geographical spread. And it was at the Coffee House that we met the hostel girls from Miranda House and Indraprastha College and other students from Hindu College. By contrast, JNU was far more socially diverse. There was a seamless and untroubled transition from the public schools and Christian-run schools to Stephen’s. The ideological cronyism that often marked its academic appointments ensured that belief systems were reproduced and perpetuated over generations. With activism being marked by astonishing sets of certitudes, it was only natural — and, indeed, inevitable — that the ambience would turn roguish once there was a challenge to the existing ideological ecosystem. Despite the apparent civility and the openness, JNU of the late-1970s was also defeating the very purpose of a university and becoming an ideological centre." DeSouza was, predictably, rationing his criticism in view of the present controversy over the explosion of "azadi" sloganeering in JNU, but the thrust of his observations are apparent. Contrary to a stereotypical view that some people have of me, I entertain a sneaking admiration of Jawaharlal Nehru University. There was a large audience who heard me and then posed both friendly and hostile questions. Whether its Student’s Union President is guilty of sedition or was a mere "useful idiot" in a more sinister game that he had failed to grasp is for the courts to decide. I sensed some of this in early-2014 when I was invited to deliver a post-dinner talk on the Narendra Modi phenomenon.The writer is a senior journalist end-of. Some of this may be explained by the fact that Stephen’s was essentially for undergraduates while JNU catered to post-graduate and research students. Billed by Indira Gandhi as a "centre of excellence" when it was established in the early-1970s, around the time I was an undergraduate at St
با سلام.به دنیای لوکس بلاگ و وبلاگ جدید خود خوش آمدید.هم اکنون میتوانید از امکانات شگفت انگیز لوکس بلاگ استفاده نمایید و مطالب خود را ارسال نمایید.شما میتوانید قالب و محیط وبلاگ خود را از مدیریت وبلاگ تغییر دهید.با فعالیت در لوکس بلاگ هر روز منتظر مسابقات مختلف و جوایز ویژه باشید.
در صورت نیاز به راهنمایی و پشتیبانی از قسمت مدیریت با ما در ارتباط باشید.برای حفظ زیبابی وبلاگ خود میتوانید این پیام را حذف نمایید.جهت حذف این مطلب وارد مدیریت وب خود شوید و از قسمت ویرایش مطالب قبلی ،مطلبی با عنوان به وبلاگ خود خوش امدید را حذف نمایید.امیدواریم لحظات خوبی را در لوکس بلاگ سپری نمایید...
:: بازدید از این مطلب : 96
عضو شوید
عضویت سریع
آمار مطالب
آمار بازدید
